SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 28742

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
M/S BENGALURU CAFE – Appellant
Versus
MR. UDAYSIMHA – Respondent


THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28.04.2026 PASSED BY THE PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF EMERGENT NOTICE (ANNEXURE A).

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

ORAL ORDER

The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.Nos.2 to 4 in O.S.No.2985/2026 dated 28.04.2026 by the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, whereby the trial Court had issued suit summons to the defendants.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff submits that the petitioner has sought for injunction against the defendants. But the trial Court had issued notice without granting temporary injunction and had observed that the defendants have already approached the BBMP authority regarding the inconvenience and hardship caused to them. Learned counsel submits that when an application is filed seeking ad interim injunction, the trial Court has to pass an order whether the plaintiff is entitled for such a relief or not. If the petitioner is not entitled

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top