SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 28784

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
SHRI. SHIVANAND S/O VEERUPAXAPPA MURKIBHAVI – Appellant
Versus
SHRI. SADANAND S/O MADIWALAPPA UPPIN – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM)

1. The present petitioner, who was defendant No.11 in a O.S.No.131/1992, is aggrieved by the order passed by the FDP Court, declining to re-determine the share in terms of amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 2005 and grant equal share to his late wife i.e., defendant No.5.

2. The learned Judge, by the order impugned, has rejected the application filed by the petitioner on the premise that the preliminary decree passed in O.S. No.131/1992 stood modified by this Court in RFA No.372/2000 c/w RFA No.424/2000, wherein the present petitioner was allotted 1/30th share in the suit schedule properties. The learned Judge has further held that the said judgment and preliminary decree having attained finality, the Final Decree Court cannot undertake any exercise to alter or modify the shares already determined by the Appellate Court.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Perused the material placed on record as well as the order impugned.

4. In the light of the rival submissions and having regard to the undisputed fact that the preliminary decree, a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top