SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 28801

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU


NC: 2026:KHC:27213


CMP No. 226 of 2025



M/S JOYALUKKAS INDIA LIMITED


ERSTWHILE M/S JOYALUKKAS INDIA PVT LTD


A COMPANY INCORPORATED


UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT,


HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE


AT DOOR NO.5/309-3,


FATHIMA NAGAR, MISSION QUARTERS,


THRISSUR, KERALA-680005


REPRESENTED BY ITS


AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY


V.S.JINESH


…PETITIONER


(BY SRI. JOSE SEBASTIAN.,ADVOCATE)


AND:


ABDUL AZEEZ


S/O B.P. HASSANABBA


R/AT NO.16/2, BANIMANATAP,


C-LAYOUT, BHUVANESWARI


KALAYAN MANDAP ROAD,


BANIMANTAP, MYSORE-570015.


HAVING OFFICE AT ANI KAVERI SILKS AND


HANDICRAFTS', L-18, L18/1, L18/1B,


DOOR/PLOT NO.2928, B.N.ROAD,


LASHKAR MOHALLA MYSORE-570001.


…RESPONDENT


THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD


DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 PRAYING TO APPOINT A SOLE ARBITRATOR TO ARBITRATE THE DISPUTE RAISED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE RESPONDENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLAUSE 19 OF LEASE AGREEMENT DATED 13.06.2014 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE B IN THE PETITION.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

The memo for withdrawal is filed stating amongst others that the petitioner and the respondent have settled their claim. The memo for withdrawal reads as under:

1. The petitioner filed the above mentioned Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator.

2. The petitioner further submits that a related petition for interim measures was filed before the Hon’ble District and Sessions Court at Mysuru in Com.A.A.No.2/2025 (subsequently registered as Com.A.A.No.1/2-26), seeking an interim injunction regarding the “Schedule B Property”.

3. During the pendency of these proceedings, the petitioner and the respondent have engaged in discussions and have amicably settled the entire subject matter of the dispute out of Court.

4. In view of the comprehensive settlement reached between the parties, the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition for the appointment of an arbitrator and prays for leave to withdraw the same as settled.

Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the CMP No.226/2025 and dismiss the same as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.

In view of the same, the petition stands dismissed.

The registry is directed to return the original records to the petitioner subject to retaining a set of photocopies thereof.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top