Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Ravi V Hosmani, J
Rishikesh Choubisa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations regarding commercial contract disputes without clear evidence of initial fraudulent intent. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. distinction between civil breach and criminal offences under s.406 and s.420 ipc. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. quashing criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process when the dispute is civil-commercial. (Para 14) |
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH IMPUGNED FIR IN CR.NO.212/2020 DATED 01.12.2020 REGISTERED WITH GIRINAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU, VISHVESHWARAPURAM SUB-DIVISION FOR OFFENCES P/U/S 406, 420 AND 34 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF IV ADDL.C.M.M., NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU AND COMPLAINT DATED 01.12.2020 AT ANNEXURES - A AND B RESPECTIVELY QUA PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL ORDER
1. Challenging complaint/FIR in Crime no.212/2020 dated 01.12.2020 registered with Girinagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punishable under Sections 406 & 420 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) on file of IV ACMM, Bengaluru, and for quashing complaint dated 01.12.2020 at Annexures-A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
