Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.Nagaprasanna, J
Santhosh Kumar M. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition contesting denial of interim custody of seized cash by lower courts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court reiterates that seized property should be released to the owner subject to security bonds and photography. (Para 3 , 4) |
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER IN CRL.RP 273/2025 DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE TO RELEASE THE REMAINING AMOUNT OF RS.14,90,731/- INFAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Heard Smt. A. Haleema Ameen, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. B.N. Jagadeesha, learned Addl. SPP appearing for the respondent and have perused the material on record.
2. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question two orders, one of the learned Magistrate and one of the Revisional Court, seeking release of an amount seized by the police during investigation quantified at Rs.14,90,731/-. Both the Courts have concurrently denied the relief to the petitioner by rejecting the applications filed under Sections
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
