THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Vijaykumar A. Patil, J
Srivasavi Adhesive Tapes Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Emu Lines Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the trial court's refusal to admit evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court holds that documents essential for justice should be admitted. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. formal order allowing production of documents. (Para 8) |
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28.10.2021 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE XXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU CITY (CCH-9) IN I.A.NO.10 IN O.S.NO.1294/2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-A & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
ORAL ORDER
This writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 28.10.2021 passed on I.A.No.10 in O.S.No.1294/2017 by the XXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (for short, ‘the trial Court’).
2. Sri.Vittala Shetty P., learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner-plaintiff could not produce some of the crucial documents, therefore, the petitioner intends to produce the documents during the evidence of PW2, hence, filed an application for production of documents which came to be rejecte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.