Ayub Ali vs Canara Bank - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 28989

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sridhar G.R., Santhosh V.S.
For the Respondents: Vinay Bhat

Table of Content
1. summary of facts and petitioners' grounds for relief. (Para 2 , 3)
2. exclusion of writ jurisdiction due to availability of alternative statutory remedies under the sarfaesi act. (Para 4 , 5)

BETWEEN:

1. SRI. AYUB ALI,

S/O. SYED MUNAVAR,

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

R/AT NO.12, PARVATHIPURA,

2ND CROSS, HOSKOTE,

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,

KARNATAKA-562114.

2. MOHSEEN UNNISA,

W/O. AYUB ALI,

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

R/AT NO.12, PARVATHIPURA,

2ND CROSS, HOSKOTE,

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,

KARNATAKA-562114.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SRIDHAR G.R., ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. SANTHOSH V.S., ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE CANARA BANK,

REPRESENTED BY ITS

AUTHORIZED OFFICER,

CORPORATE OFFICE: ARM BRANCH,

NEW EXTENSION, NEAR ITO,

DOOM LIGHT CIRCLE, KOLAR TOWN,

KOLAR-563101.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. VINAY BHAT, ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

Sri.Sridhar G.R., counsel on behalf of Sri.Santhosh V.S., for the petitioners and Sri.Vinay Bhat, counsel for the respondent appeared in person.

2. This petition is filed seeking following r