Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Suraj Govindaraj, J
Shashikala – Appellant
Versus
Munegowda – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of relief sought against lok adalat awards. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. efficacy of documented voluntary consent in lok adalat proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. dismissal of petition due to lack of substantiated grounds. (Para 9) |
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE LOK ADALAT COMPROMISE DECREE/AWARD PASSED IN O.S NO. 702/2015 BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI CONSEQUENTLY 06-02-2016 DATED VIDE ANNEXURE A AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Notice to the respondent is dispensed with, in view of the proposed order to be passed.
2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
1) Set aside the Lok-adalat compromise decree/award passed in O.S No. 702/2015 by the learned Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Devanahalli dated 06-02-2016 vide Annexure-A. consequently;
2) Restore the suit in O.S No. 702 of 2015 on the file of senior Civil judge, Devanahalli, Bengaluru rural district to be decided in accordance to law.
3) Consequently
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
