Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Lalitha Kanneganti, J
B.N. Lakshmaiah – Appellant
Versus
Nallammal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trial court's discretion to allow amendments regarding subsequent events. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. appellate courts should not interfere with necessary amendments made to resolve real controversies. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ANNEXURE-A ORDER DATED 17.03.2025 ALLOWED THE APPLICATION IN IA NO. 6 FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN OS NO.366/2015 PENDING IN 1ST ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT BANGALORE BY ALLOWING THE PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
1. Aggrieved by the orders passed on I.A.No.6 in O.S.No.366/2015 dated 17.03.2025 by the 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural district, Bangalore, the petitioner-plaintiff is before this Court.
2. The plaintiff has filed the suit seeking specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 23.01.2012. An application is filed by the defendant seeking amendment of the pleadings. It is stated that plaintiff has filed the suit for specific performance and for other reliefs and the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
