SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 29127

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU


NC: 2026:KHC:27570


WRIT PETITION NO.14547 OF 2023 (KLR-CON)


DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026


BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH


BETWEEN:

SRI. N. RAMESH

S/O SRI. C.S. NARAYANSWAMY,

AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,

R/AT HEBBALLI VILLAGE,

CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK,

CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.

…PETITIONER


(BY SRI. YESHU BABA R. MISHRA, ADVOCATE)


AND:

1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT,

CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 101.

2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION,

CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.

3. TAHSILDAR

CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK,

CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.

4. SRI. C.R. BABU,

S/O LATE C.R. RAMASWAMY,

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS.

5. SRI. C.R. VENKATACHALAPATHY

S/O LATE C.R. RAMASWAMY,

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.

BOTH RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 ARE

R/AT THOTADAMANE,

HONNENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI,

CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK

CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.

…RESPONDENTS


(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 14TH OCTOBER, 2015 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-A, CANCELLING THE CONVERSION ORDER OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY FROM AGRICULTURE TO NON-AGRICULTURAL PURPOSE DATED 09TH NOVEMBER, 2011; AND ETC.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 14th October, 2015 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent No.1, wherein the order of conversion of petition schedule property from Agriculture to Non-Agricultural purpose dated 09th November, 2011 was cancelled.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the material on record.

3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is well settled principle in law that, once the respondent-Deputy Commissioner passes the order of conversion under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, the said authority becomes functus officio. Therefore, following the law declared by this Court in the case of SMT. RATHNA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER made in Writ Petition No.45634 of 2013 decided on 14th November, 2013, the impugned order deserves to be set-aside. Accordingly, I pass the following:

O R D E R

(i) Writ Petition allowed;

(ii) Order dated 14th October, 2015 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent No.1 is hereby set-aside.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top