THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
D K Singh, T.M. Nadaf, JJ
G. Kumar – Appellant
Versus
G.R. Shamalamma – Respondent
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:01.03.2012 PASSED IN O.S NO.434/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH.18), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M. NADAF)
This regular first appeal is filed under Section 96 r/w Order XLI Rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the defendant, assailing the judgment and decree dated 01.03.2012 in O.S.No.434/2010 passed by the XIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, at Bangalore City (CCH-18)1"Trial Court" for short.
2. By the impugned judgment and decree, the trial Court decreed the suit as claimed for Rs.10,59,078/- with costs and current interest thereon at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.
3. The parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court.
4. Facts in brief to file this present appeal are as under:
5. The plaintiffs filed a suit for recovery of money for a total
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.