Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S.Indiresh, J
Balaji Raju – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to revenue orders regarding land mutation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. mutation based on registered deed during pending civil suit. (Para 3) |
| 3. non-interference of writ jurisdiction during pending civil proceedings. (Para 4) |
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHI THE IMPUGNED ORDER 19.08.25 IN RP/534/25 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AT ANNEXURE-Q AND ALSO THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 DATED 14.12.2022 IN CASE NO R.A (B.E) 552/2022 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-J; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 19.08.2025 (Annexure-Q) passed by respondent No.2 and the order dated 14.12.2022 passed by respondent No.3 (Annexure-J).
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and upon perusal of the material on record, it is evident that the revenue authorities have effected the mutation in terms of the registered Sale Deed dated 22.11.2022. It is also to be noted that a civil sui
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
