Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S.Indresh, J
Basheer Ulla Khan – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and challenge to the tribunal's order on i.a. no.1. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. lack of perversity or jurisdictional error in discretionary orders. (Para 4) |
| 3. direction for expedited disposal without opinion on merits. (Para 5 , 6) |
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 31-10-2025 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ON I.A. NO.1 FILED IN REVISION PETITION NO.134/2025 ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents Nos.1 and 2.
2. Heard Sri. Prakash B.N., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader.
3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 31.10.2025 passed on I.A. No.1 in R.P. No.134/2025 (Annexure-A) by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal.
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and upon perusal of the impugned order, I am of the opinion that no interference
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
