SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 30519

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Vibhu Bakhru, CJ, K.S. Hemalekha, J
L.V. Traders – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Nataraja Ballal A.
For the Respondents: Namitha Mahesh B.G., Srinivasa C.

Table of Content
1. appeal becomes infructuous upon issuance of a fresh tender. (Para 1)
2. dismissal of appeal and disposal of interlocutory applications. (Para 2 , 3)

THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT READ WITH RULE 27 OF THE WRIT PROCEDDINGS RULES PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08.09.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN SO FAR AS DISPOSING OF WRIT PETITION No.12156/2025 (GM-TEN) AND ALLOW THE APPEAL.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

and

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)

1. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that the present appeal has been rendered infructuous as the tendering authority has floated a fresh tender. He submits that the present appeal may be dismissed accordingly.

2. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed.

3. The pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top