THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Vibhu Bakhru, CJ, K.S. Hemalekha, J
L.V. Traders – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal becomes infructuous upon issuance of a fresh tender. (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissal of appeal and disposal of interlocutory applications. (Para 2 , 3) |
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT READ WITH RULE 27 OF THE WRIT PROCEDDINGS RULES PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08.09.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN SO FAR AS DISPOSING OF WRIT PETITION No.12156/2025 (GM-TEN) AND ALLOW THE APPEAL.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that the present appeal has been rendered infructuous as the tendering authority has floated a fresh tender. He submits that the present appeal may be dismissed accordingly.
2. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed.
3. The pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.