Back
2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6201
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHAJI P.CHALY, J
MICHAEL JOE FRANCIS – Appellant
Versus
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR – Respondent
WP(C) 3910/2023
APARNA C.MENON, ARUN CHANDRAN, K. RAJESH KANNAN, E.D.GEORGE, LINU G. NATH, BENET SELVAN, S.BRISONE T. MATHEW, GEORGE SEBASTIAN, ARUN LUCKOSE ABRAHAM(K/000242/2018)
Judicial review of judges' evaluations in cultural competitions is limited and intervention is only justified in cases of clear legal violations or extreme circumstances.
Headnote:
Judgment - Cultural Events - Article 226 - Court's Decision
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners were eliminated from selection for cultural events at Sacred Heart College, claiming unfair evaluation and inadequate performance time compared to guidelines. They sought judicial intervention after their appeals were rejected.
Issues: Whether the petitioners faced unfair evaluation in cultural competitions and if judicial intervention is warranted under Article 226.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that it cannot interfere with the evaluations of judges unless there is clear evidence of illegality, mala fides, or gross irregularity, which the petitioners failed to demonstrate.
Final Decision: The writ petitions are dismissed.
JUDGMENT
The captioned writ petitions are materially connected in respect of elimination of the petitioners from selection to various cultural events conducted by Sacred Heart College, Thevara to qualify the students to participate in the Mahatma Gandhi University Intercollegiate Youth Festival scheduled from 08.02.2023 to 12.02.2023 at Ernakulam. Therefore, I heard them together and proposed to pass this common judgment.
2. The petitioners in W.P.(C) Nos. 2855 of 2023 and 2867 of
2023 have participated in the Kerala Natanam competition. Only the first place winner would be selected to participate in the Mahatma Gandhi University Youth Festival. Admittedly, the petitioners could secure second and third place respectively in the intra collegiate competition. Being aggrieved, they have submitted a representation before the Principal of the College and as per the direction issued by the Principal, the said event was conducted again with all the participants. In that process, one of the petitioners i.e., the petitioner in W. P. (C) No. 2867 of 2023 was placed second and the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 2855 of 2023 became fourth. Even though an appeal was preferred before the Grievance Committee of the College, it was also rejected stating that the decisions of the Judges are considered to be final.
3. The paramount contention advanced by the petitioners is that as per the guidelines issued by the Mahatma Gandhi University, the kerala Natanam competition has a duration of 15 minutes for each participants; whereas, in the guidelines issued by the Sacred Heart College, Thevara, 10 minutes is provided to each participants. But, according to the petitioners, all the participants were provided only 4 minutes and therefore, the participants could not make their performance to the fullest extent and the best manner in order to impress the Judges, and enable the Judges to evaluate the participants.
4. A counter affidavit is filed by the College in both the writ petitions refuting the allegations raised in the writ petitions. Among other contentions, it is stated that on account of the representation submitted to the Principal, the competition was conducted again and all participants were permitted to perform again on 18.01.2023. However, the petitioners could secure only the fourth and second place respectively. It is also submitted that the Grievance Committee considered the issue and was of the opinion that the evaluation made by the Judges need not be altered.
5. Insofar as W.P.(C) No. 3910 of 2023 is concerned, the petitioner participated in the Wind Instrument Western and among two participants, the petitioner became second. The grievance highlighted by the petitioner is that he performed better than the first prize winner. It is also contended that the petitioner is selected to three other cultural events and therefore, if he is permitted to participate in the intercollegiate Youth Festival, there is a likelihood of the petitioner becoming kalathilakam.
6. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners Sri Arun Chandran, Sri. K. Rajesh Kannan and Sri. E.D. George in the respective writ petitions, the learned Standing Counsel for the M.G University, Sri. Surin George Ipe, and the learned counsel for the Sacred Heart College Sri. George Sebastian, and perused the pleadings and material on record.
7. The discussion of facts made above would make it clear that the petitioners are challenging the intra college competition to various events on the ground that their performances were not properly judged by the Judges and consequently, they are unable to participate in the intercollegiate competition conducted by the Mahatma Gandhi University. At the outset, it is made clear that there are no allegations made by any of the petitioners that there is any proved mala fides or nepotism in the matter of evaluation made by the Judges. It is also equally important to note that the allegations made by the petitioners are in respect of the evaluation m
