SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 36050

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHIRCY V., J
MUNSHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
LIFFY P. FRANCIS

ORDER

Apprehending arrest in connection with O.R. No. 12 of 2021 of Pattikad Forest Station the petitioners who are arraigned as the accused have moved this application for pre- arrest bail. They along with four others, are alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections 2 (16), 2(32), 9, 39(1)(a)(b)(d), 3(a)(b)(c), 50, 51(1) and 57 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Sections 7 , 24 and 55 of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 .

2. The prosecution has alleged that the accused were found in unauthorized possession of 19 kgs. of 'ambergris' on 09.07.2021 by the forest officials near Kajah Resort kept for the purpose of sale in black market. The same is included in Serial No.5A in Schedule II Part II of Wildlife (Protection) Act and is coming under protected species. It was seized from the possession of the petitioners by the forest officials. But they could apprehend only accused Nos.1,2 and 3. The value of the same in black market is Rs.30 Crores and the sale of 'Ambergris' which is used for making perfumes is prohibited by law. Now the investigation of the case is only proceeding as the some of the accused have not been apprehended so far.

3. According to the lea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top