SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 44183

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
MADHUSOODANAN NAMBOODIRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl./4246/2022



Anticipatory bail in cases of economic offences is granted only in exceptional circumstances due to the serious nature and implications of such allegations.

Headnote:

Bail - Anticipatory Bail - IPC - Sections 406, 420 - Court analyzed the seriousness of economic offences, considering the substantial amount involved and the nature of the allegations, leading to the dismissal of the anticipatory bail application.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, accused in a case of criminal breach of trust and cheating, claims innocence but is alleged to have caused a significant financial loss to the bank through falsification of documents while managing operations.

Finding of the Court:

The court determined that given the serious allegations, significant amount due to the bank, and the nature of the offences, anticipatory bail was not warranted despite the petitioner’s claims of repayment and collateral provided.

Issues: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted considering the allegations of economic fraud and the seriousness of the offences under the IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the gravity of the charges and the amount involved necessitate a cautious approach towards granting anticipatory bail, especially in economic offence cases.

Final Decision: Bail application is dismissed.

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

2. Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.469 of 2018 of Chevayur Police Station, Kozhikode registered alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. Prosecution allegation is that the accused while working as Manager (Operations) under the Dhanalakshmi Bank, Chevarambalam Branch, he was in charge of gold loan, fixed deposits etc. It is further alleged that the accused has intentionally committed falsification of documents and thus committed the offences of criminal breach of trust and cheating and thereby the bank has suffered a loss of Rs.73,66,751/-.

4. Petitioner submits that he is totally innocent of the allegations levelled against him and that as part of settlement he has paid an amount of Rs.23 lakhs to the bank and further that going by Annexure-2, 100 sovereigns of gold ornaments kept by the petitioner was also put in auction by the bank towards the loss and that a suit has been filed and 30 cents of land owned by the petitioner is under attachment and thereby the amount due to the bank has been sufficiently secured.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant filed a detailed objection in which he has produced Annexures-R3(a) to (d) which are admissions on the part of the petitioner. Learned counsel further contended that the repayment of the amount after commission of the offence cannot be a reason for grant of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel relied on the judgment inP.Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement ( AIR 2019 SC 4198 ) to contend for the position in cases of economic offences, fraud, etc. the court shall grant anticipatory bail only in exceptional cases. Learned counsel for the defacto complainant further submitted that as of date a total amount of Rs.67 lakhs is due to the bank and the bank is dealing with public money and the offence should be viewed very seriously.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the seriousness of the allegations, I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. It is for the petitioner to surrender before the investigating officer and co-operate with the investigation. In the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional Magistrate on the very same day. If an application for bail is filed with advance copy to the Public Prosecutor, the jurisdictional Magistrate may consider the bail application preferably on the very same day.

Bail application is accordingly dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top