JUDGMENT

Dated this the 15th day of January 2020 The complainant in ST No. 1274/2005 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-1 Palakkad, aggrieved by the acquittal of the accused under section 255(1) of Cr.P.C. for offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act , has preferred this appeal.

2. The case of the complainant was that, they were conducting a kuri, from the Kozhikode Branch, in which the accused had subscribed a chitty for Rs.1,00,000/-. He bid the chitty for Rs.50,000/- and received the amount on execution of necessary documents. He thereafter failed to remit the future installments. Towards the discharge of the existing liability, the accused executed and delivered to the complainant a cheque for a sum of Rs.47,500/- drawn on his account. The cheque was presented for collection but was returned dishonoured. Statutory notice was issued, which was neither replied nor the amount paid. Hence, the complaint was laid alleging commission of offence punishable under section 138 of the NI Act.

3. Before the court below, the accused appeared and pleaded innocence. On the side of the complainant, his power of attorney holder was examined as PW1 . Exts.P1 to P8