HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. Muhamed Mustaque, SOPHY THOMAS, JJ
DR.RAJU NARAYANA SWAMY IAS., – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA, – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.
This original petition was filed challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Ernakulam Bench. The petitioner is the Seniormost IAS Officer and is currently the Principal Secretary to Government. He approached the CAT as he was not considered for apex scale promotion as the Chief Secretary. The Central Administrative Tribunal, noting the procedure for the appointment of the Chief Secretary, negated the challenge. This is how the petitioner approached this Court challenging the said order under Article 227 of the Constitution.
2. The learned Senior Counsel, referring to Annexure A8 relating to the promotion of members of the Indian Administrative Service, argued that the petitioner is not claiming an appointment as the Chief Secretary but only claiming a promotion to grade him as the Chief Secretary. It is submitted that in the absence of any adverse remarks in the ACR, he is entitled to be graded as the Chief Secretary on completion of 30 years of service as a member of the Indian Administrative Service.
3. It is appropriate to refer to the principles relating to promotion in the grade of Chief Secretary as referred in Anne
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.