SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 48247

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J
MARHABATH BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dated this the 28th day of February 2020 The petitioner approached this Court for police protection. It appears that the dispute is between the petitioner and her neighbours. The petitioner attempted to construct a compound wall. This has been objected by the party respondents.

2. Any dispute between the parties can be resolved through the civil court. However, the police shall maintain law and order if there is any vitiating element exits on account of such construction.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE

ln

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF TAX RECEIPT DATED 8.4.2019 OF

49.40 ARES OF PETITIONER'S PROPERTY ISSUED BY KADINAMKULAM VILLAGE OFFICE.

EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF TANDAPER REGISTER OF 49.40 ARES OF PETITIONER'S PROPERTY.

EXHIBIT P1 B TRUE COPY OF TAX RECEIPT DATED 24.4.2019 OF

69.60 ARES OF PETITIONER'S PROPERTY ISSUED BY VEILOOR AM VILLAGE OFFICE.

EXHIBIT P1 C TRUE COPY OF TANDAPER REGISTER OF 69.60 ARES OF PETITIONER'S PROPERTY.

EXHIBIT P1 D TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED NO.352/92 OF SRO, MURUKKUMPUZHA.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFOR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top