HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J
MARHABATH BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 28th day of February 2020 The petitioner approached this Court for police protection. It appears that the dispute is between the petitioner and her neighbours. The petitioner attempted to construct a compound wall. This has been objected by the party respondents.
2. Any dispute between the parties can be resolved through the civil court. However, the police shall maintain law and order if there is any vitiating element exits on account of such construction.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF TAX RECEIPT DATED 8.4.2019 OF
49.40 ARES OF PETITIONER'S PROPERTY ISSUED BY KADINAMKULAM VILLAGE OFFICE.
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF TANDAPER REGISTER OF 49.40 ARES OF PETITIONER'S PROPERTY.
EXHIBIT P1 B TRUE COPY OF TAX RECEIPT DATED 24.4.2019 OF
69.60 ARES OF PETITIONER'S PROPERTY ISSUED BY VEILOOR AM VILLAGE OFFICE.
EXHIBIT P1 C TRUE COPY OF TANDAPER REGISTER OF 69.60 ARES OF PETITIONER'S PROPERTY.
EXHIBIT P1 D TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED NO.352/92 OF SRO, MURUKKUMPUZHA.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFOR
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.