SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 62342

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. Ajithkumar, JJ
ETTAMAL KHALID – Appellant
Versus
SEERE VALAPPIL MUHAMMED RAFEEQ – Respondent


O R D E R

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The petitioner is the respondent in R.C.P.No.40 of 2012 on the file of the Rent Control Court (Munsiff), Payyannur, which is a petition filed by the respondents herein-landlords under Sections 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 seeking an order of eviction of the tenant from the petition schedule building. The Rent Control Petition was allowed under Sections 11(2) (b), 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Act by the order dated 31.01.2014 of the Rent Control Court. Challenging the aforesaid order dated 31.01.2014, the tenant filed R.C.A.No.52 of 2014 before the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Additional District Judge-IV). The Appellate Authority, vide judgment dated 06.08.2021, partly allowed the appeal by vacating the order of eviction granted under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act, however confirming the order of eviction under Sections 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Act. Challenging the order dated 31.01.2014 of the Rent Control Court and also the judgment dated 06.08.2021 of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, petitioner-tenant is before this Court in this Rent Control Revision under Section 20 of the Act.

2.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top