HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. Muhamed Mustaque, S.MANU, JJ
THE MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
MATHEW THOMAS – Respondent
. These appeals arise from the judgment of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)No.41092 of 2023. The appellant in W.A.No.505 of 2024 is the 5th respondent in the writ petition. W.A.No.507 of 2024 is filed by the 4th respondent, Manager. The 1st respondent in both these appeals is the writ petitioner. We refer to the parties as they are arrayed in W.A.No.505 of 2024.
2. We will start with the relevant facts. The appellant was appointed as Higher Secondary School Teacher on 24.8.1998 in Syrian Christian Higher Secondary School, Chellackadu, Ranni. The 1st respondent also joined service on the same day as a Higher Secondary School Teacher (Junior).
He was later appointed as HSST on 15.7.1999.
3. In Ext.P1 seniority list as on 01.01.2018 the 1st respondent was shown as senior to the appellant. The said seniority list was circulated among the teachers and the appellant as well as the 1st respondent had signed the same.
Thus, the said seniority list was well within the knowledge of both parties. It is pleaded by the appellant that she pointed out the anomaly to the then Manager and sought correction. Later, she submitted a representation to the 4th respondent on 21.1.2022 pointing ou
Francina Antony and another v. State of Kerala and others
Rabindranath Bose and others v. The Union of India & others
Ramchandra Shankar Deodhar & others v. State of Maharashtra & others
Manager, Corporate Educational Agency v. James Mathew & others
Manager, St.Paul's Higher Secondary School v. State of Kerala and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.