HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MR. MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHSILDAR, DEVIKULAM TALUK, – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner states that he is the owner in title and possession of an item of property having an extent of 24.15 Ares situated in various survey numbers at Kanthalloor Village, which was purchased as per Exhibit P1 sale deed. According to the petitioner, he conducted a private survey and realized that the physical boundary of the property and boundary description in the title deed varies with the boundary description in the Field Measurement Sketch and Field Supplementary Sketch retained in the office of the respondents. In order to correct the discrepancy, the petitioner herein preferred Exts.P3 and P4 applications before the 1st respondent. His grievance is that the said applications are not taken up and considered by the 1st respondent till date. It is in the aforesaid circumstances the petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:- i. to issue an appropriate writ of mandamus directing the respondents to correct the boundary descriptions of the petitioner’s property in Field Measurement Sketch and Field Supplementary Sketch and other connected Taluk and Village Office documents inconsistent with the physical boundary of the property and Exts.P1 a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.