SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 47823

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MR. MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHSILDAR, DEVIKULAM TALUK, – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner states that he is the owner in title and possession of an item of property having an extent of 24.15 Ares situated in various survey numbers at Kanthalloor Village, which was purchased as per Exhibit P1 sale deed. According to the petitioner, he conducted a private survey and realized that the physical boundary of the property and boundary description in the title deed varies with the boundary description in the Field Measurement Sketch and Field Supplementary Sketch retained in the office of the respondents. In order to correct the discrepancy, the petitioner herein preferred Exts.P3 and P4 applications before the 1st respondent. His grievance is that the said applications are not taken up and considered by the 1st respondent till date. It is in the aforesaid circumstances the petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:- i. to issue an appropriate writ of mandamus directing the respondents to correct the boundary descriptions of the petitioner’s property in Field Measurement Sketch and Field Supplementary Sketch and other connected Taluk and Village Office documents inconsistent with the physical boundary of the property and Exts.P1 a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top