SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6780

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
ABDULLA @ ABDULLA KUNHI A M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. 446/2024



Advocates:
M.K.SUMOD VIDYA M.K. RAJ CAROLIN V. THUSHARA.K

Accused persons are entitled to pre-arrest bail if they are not likely to abscond or interfere with the investigation.

Headnote:

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were accused of committing various offenses, including rioting, assault, and causing grievous hurt. They filed a petition for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners had surrendered before the Investigating Officer and their interrogation had been completed. The court also noted that the petitioners had not been involved in any other offense while on bail.

Issues: Whether the petitioners should be granted pre-arrest bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioners were entitled to pre-arrest bail subject to certain conditions, including that they cooperate with the investigation, do not intimidate witnesses, do not leave India without permission, and do not violate any of the other conditions imposed by the court.

Final Decision: The court made the interim order dated 30.01.2024 absolute, subject to the conditions imposed.

O R D E R

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioners are the accused Nos. 3 to 5 in Crime No.35/2024 of the Bekal Police Station, Kasaragod registered against the accused (five in number), for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 308 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Subsequently, Section 326 of the IPC has been incorporated in the crime.

3. When the bail application came up for consideration on 30.01.2024, this Court passed an interim order, by directing the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer within seven days from the date of order and subject themselves to interrogation.

4. Heard; Sri.M.K.Sumod, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Smt.Neema T.V., the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that, pursuant to the order dated 30.01.2024 passed by this Court, the petitioners appeared before the Investigating Officer on 05.02.2024 and their interrogation has been completed. Hence, the interim order can be made absolute, subject to additional conditions. The said submission is recorded.

Resultantly, the bail application is disposed of by making the interim order dated 30.01.2024 absolute, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation and make themselves available for interrogation and for the purpose of investigation as and when the Investigating Officer directs;

(ii) The petitioners shall not intimidate witnesses or interfere with the investigation in any manner;

(iii)The petitioners shall not get involved in any other offence while on bail.

(iv) The petitioners shall not leave India without the permission of the jurisdictional Court;

(v) In case of violation of any of the conditions above, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law.

(vi) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall also be filed before the court below.

(vii)Needless to mention, it would be well within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioners even while the petitioners are on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State(NCT of Delhi) and Anr. [2020 (1) KHC

663].

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top