HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
LAKSHMI PILLAI OMANAPILLAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“a. Issue a Writ of Certiorari to quash Exts. P9 and P10 notices issued by the 2nd and 3rd respondents;
b. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to comply the formalities covered by GO (MS)550/1968, thereby complete the assigning process of the property;
C. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the 4th respondent to effect necessary corrections in the revenue records so as to treat the property of 1.60 Ares of land which situated in re-survey No.22/12 of the Panthalam Thekkekkara Village, belongs to the 2nd petitioner;
d. issue any such other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, fair and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
e. Cost of the Proceedings.”[SIC]
2. When this Writ petition came up for consideration on 20.03.2015, this Court directed to maintain the status quo. The main challenge in this Writ petition is against Exts.P9 and P10. The learned Government Pleader submitted that these are only show cause notices. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that, as per Exts.P3 and P4, the Government
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.