SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 34841

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MARY JOSEPH, J
AJAYAN – Appellant
Versus
SYAMA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.SASI M.R., SRI.P.K.SASIKUMAR, SRI.T.B.SIVAPRASAD, SMT.MANJU E.R.

ORDER

Dated this the 1st day of October. 2020 The revision on hand is filed against an order passed by Family Court, Ottapalam on 08.06.2020 in M.C.No.80 of 2016. The revision petitioner is the respondent and the respondents in the revision are the petitioners in the M.C before the Family Court. The respondent was aggrieved by the order passed by the Family Court directing him to pay monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- and Rs.2,000/- respectively to the 1st and 2nd petitioners.

2. The facts of the case relevant for disposal of this revision are stated in brief hereunder:

For clarity the parties to this revision will be referred to hereinafter as the respondent and the petitioners in accordance with their status in the M.C before the Family Court.

3. The 1st petitioner and the respondent got married on

11.11.2013 in Kanjiravalli Siva Temple as per the religious rites and customs prevalent in their community. They lived together for sometime in the matrimonial home. On 12.11.2014, the 2nd petitioner, a girl child was born. In the matrimonial home the 1st petitioner was subjected to mental and physical torture by the respondent alleging that she is not good looking and did not b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top