JUDGMENT

Dated this the 5 ^th day of February, 2025 The writ petition is preferred challenging Ext.P1 order whereby the entire dispute between the petitioner and the District Industries Centre as well as the 2^nd respondent has been reconsidered afresh in the light of the direction in judgment dated 10.08.2015 in WA No.1468/2014.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner Company was allotted with 2.50 acres of land on two occasions, i.e., in 2001 and 2002 (1.75 acres + 0.75 acres). The petitioner has executed amended agreement. Thereafter, on receipt of certain applications for allotment, especially from the 2^nd respondent demanding 1 acre as an additional space for his existing unit, an inspection was conducted and found by the 1^st respondent that the petitioner was not utilizing the land allotted to them. At the same time, M/s. Rollmen Industries, owned by the 2^nd respondent, was functioning in its full potential and seeking for additional space. Considering the genuinity of request as well as the non utilization of the land allotted to the petitioner, it was decided to resume 0.75 acres of land from the petitioner, which was lying at the opposite of an internal road. U