SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 50140

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
T.V.ANILKUMAR, J
CLEETAS – Appellant
Versus
SREEDHARAN PILLAI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dated this the 16th day of February 2021 When this matter came up for admission, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition which was filed for condoning the delay in the institution of A.S.No.63 of 2018 pending before Sub Court, Karunagappally was already condoned and further execution proceedings in O.S.No.288 of 2010 on the file of the Musiff-Magistrate's Court, Sasthamcotta were also stayed. That means the issue raised in this Original Petition does not survive any longer. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, makes a request to issue a direction to the court below to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible.

In the result, while dismissing this Original Petition, the appellate court is called upon to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible.

Sd/- T.V.ANILKUMAR JUDGE csl APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE DATED

27/10/2015 IN OS NO.288/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, SASTHAMCOTTAH.

EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL CMA NO.7/2018 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE SUB COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY.

EXHIBIT P3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top