JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court impelling twin problems. For the first, she says that tax with respect to her property - covered by Ext.P1 Sale Deed - though was allowed to be remitted, as is evident from Ext.P2, in the past, permission for it is now being denied without any valid reason. For the second, she says that, her husband owned the property covered by Ext.P9 Tax Receipt and that consequent to his death, it devolved upon her and children but that, when she made an application for transfer of its Registry in their favour, it has been refused without assigning any cogent reason.

2. Sri.J.S.Ajith Kumar – learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that, in the afore background, his client has now been constrained to approach this Court, seeking that she be allowed to remit Land Tax on the property covered by Ext.P1; and further that the property of her husband be directed to be transferred in Registry in her and her children’s name without any avoidable delay.

3. In response, the learned Senior Government Pleader –

Smt.Surya Binoy, submitted that the competent Authorities are incapacitated from acceding to the requests of the petitioner because, with respect t