HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MARY JOSEPH, J
SATHIYAMMA RAJENDRAN
– Appellant
Versus
GIREESH KUMAR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 13th day of July, 2022 This appeal is preferred against the judgment of II Additional Court of Sessions, Thiruvananthapuram (for short ‘the appellate court’) in Crl.Appeal No.32/2015.
2. The judgment was passed on 02.12.2015 and the 1st respondent herein was acquitted by the appellate court. The reasoning of the appellate court while acquitting the accused was that the source of income to advance the money was not proved by the complainant. The complaint was filed to launch the prosecution before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court For Trial of Forest Offences, Nedumangad (for short ‘the trial court’).
3. Before the trial court, both parties had adduced evidence. On the side of the prosecution, PW1 and PW2 were examined and Exts.P1 to P5 were marked. On the side of the accused, DW1 to DW3 were examined and Exts.D1 and D2 were marked. After appreciation of the above evidence, the trial court has found the accused guilty for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘NI Act’) and convicted and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to deposit a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- as fine and to underg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.