HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MURALEE KRISHNA S., J
PANIKKAN VEETTIL KUNHIRAMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution case details (Para 3) |
| 2. trial court proceedings (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. defense argument on evidence (Para 6) |
| 4. verification of evidence (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. absence of label (Para 9) |
| 6. specimen seal importance (Para 10 , 11) |
| 7. prosecution's burden (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
O R D E R
This Revision Petition is filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C by the accused in S.C. No.80 of 2005 on the file of the Court of Assistant Sessions Judge, Payyanur. As per the judgment dated 18.11.2010 passed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, the petitioner was found guilty of the offence under Section 55 (g) of the Kerala Abkari Act and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 60 days.
2. The appeal filed by the revision petitioner before the Court of Session Division, Thalassery was partly allowed as per the judgment dated 21.11.2013 passed in Crl.A.No.516 of 2010, confirming the conviction but modifying the sentence by reducing the substantive sentence as rigorous imprisonment for one year. The fine portion of the sentence and the default sentence were ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.