J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is the owner of a motor car bearing registration No.KL-2/AB 9599. He has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P1 notice issued by the 4th respondent-Regional Transport Officer.

2. Ext.P1 alleges that, the vehicle in question was found having violated traffic signal and speed limits on several occasions (four). The notice alleges that the user of the vehicle is a threat for pedestrians and other users of the road. Ext.P1 further calls for production of the driving licence of the person who drove the vehicle within three days in terms of Section 133 of the Motor Vehicles Act . Ext.P1 further cautioned the petitioner that, if the driving licence as called for is not produced within the time, the petitioner's driving licence and also the registration of the vehicle will be cancelled.

3. The writ petition contains various narratives/

personal allegations against the 4th respondent. He has also been impleaded in his personal capacity as the 5th respondent. For the purpose of disposal of the present writ petition I do not think it necessary to go into the factual details since, Ext.P1, on the face of it, is unsustainable for reasons more than one.

4. Section