SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 36669

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
RATHEESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. 10289/2024



Advocates:
JITHIN BABU A ARUN SAMUEL ANOOD JALAL K.J.

Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; conditions for bail under the NDPS Act were not met, allowing for the grant of bail.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Section 22(b) - Bail Application - The petitioner, accused of possessing intermediate quantity of MDMA, is granted bail as the conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not attracted due to lack of criminal antecedents. (Paras 6, 7, 8, 9)

(B) Principle of Bail - The court reiterates that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, emphasizing the need for fair trial opportunities and the importance of not denying bail in deserving cases. (Paras 7, 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested for possession of 1 gram of MDMA and has been in custody since 05.10.2024. The prosecution acknowledged the absence of prior criminal records.

Findings of Court:
Bail is granted with specific conditions to ensure cooperation with the investigation and prevent further offenses.

Issues: The main issue was whether the conditions for granting bail under the NDPS Act were satisfied given the nature of the offense and the petitioner's background.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the petitioner’s lack of criminal antecedents and the nature of the seized quantity justified the grant of bail, reaffirming the principle that bail should not be denied without valid reasons.

Result: Bail Application allowed.

ORDER

This Bail Application is filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.856/2024 of Kaipamangalam Police Station. The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging offence punishable under Section 22 (b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short, NDPS Act).

3. The prosecution case is that, on 05. 10.2024 at 01.30 pm, the accused was found in possession of 1 gram of MDMA kept in a plastic cover held by accused while he was standing in front of his house.

4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.

5. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 05.10.2024. The counsel submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide any conditions if this Court release him on bial. The Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. But the Public Prosecutor submitted that the contraband seized from the petitioner is intermediate quantity and no criminal antecedents are reported against the petitioner.

6. In the light of the fact that the offence alleged is under 22(b) of the NDPS Act and only intermediate quantity is seized from the petitioner, the rigor under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is not attracted. Admittedly the petitioner is in custody from 05.10.2024. No criminal antecedents is alleged against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I think bail can be granted. But I make it clear that if the petitioner is involved in similar offence in future, the Investigating Officer is free to file appropriate application before the jurisdictional court for cancellation of bail and if such an application is filed, the jurisdictional court is free to pass appropriate orders, even though this order is passed by this Court.

7. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram. P v Directorate of Enforcement [2019 (16) SCALE 870], after considering all the earlier judgments, observed that, the basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception so as to ensure that the accused has the opportunity of securing fair trial.

8. Moreover, in Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India [2024 KHC 6431] , the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:

“21. Before we part with the Judgment, we must mention here that the Special Court and the High Court did not consider the material in the charge sheet objectively. Perhaps the focus was more on the activities of PFI, and therefore, the appellant's case could not be properly appreciated. When a case is made out for a grant of bail, the Courts should not have any hesitation in granting bail. The allegations of the prosecution may be very serious. But, the duty of the Courts is to consider the case for grant of bail in accordance with the law. "Bail is the rule and jail is an exception" is a settled law. Even in a case like the present case where there are stringent conditions for the grant of bail in the relevant statutes, the same rule holds good with only modification that the bail can be granted if the conditions in the statute are satisfied. The rule also means that once a case is made out for the grant of bail, the Court cannot decline to grant bail. If the Courts start denying bail in deserving cases, it will be a violation of the rights guaranteed under Art.21 of our Constitution.” (underline supplied)

9. In Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement [2024 KHC 6426] , also the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:

“53. The Court further observed that, over a period of time, the trial courts and the High Courts have forgotten a very well - settled principle of law that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment. From our experience, we can say that it appears that the trial courts and the High Courts attempt to play safe in matters of grant of bail. The principle that bail is a rule and refusal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top