The court emphasized that a conviction in sexual assault cases must be based on reliable evidence, and discrepancies in the survivor's testimony and investigation can undermine the prosecution's case.

J U D G M E N T

[CRL.A Nos.527/2020, 626/2020, 752/2020 & 674/2020]

Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.

These appeals have been preferred by the accused Nos. 1 to 4 in S.C.No.

22 of 2019 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge (For the Trial of Cases relating to Atrocities and Sexual Violence against Women and Children), Ernakulam. They were charged for having committed offences punishable under Sections 120B , 366 r/w. Section 34, 366A, 376(2)(n), 376D of the IPC and Section 5 (l) r/w. Section 6 , 5(g) r/w. of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 77 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 . 2. By the impugned judgment, A. the accused Nos. 1 to 4 were found guilty for the offence under Section 376D of the and r/w. (g) of the POCSO Act, 2012 and they were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 years each and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- each with a default clause. No separate sentence was ordered under the POCSO Act.

B. the accused Nos. 1 and 2 were found guilty and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years each and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each under Section 366 r/w. Section 34 of the IPC with a default clause;

C. Accused No. 2 was found guilty and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs10,000/- under Section 366A of the IPC with a default clause;

D. Accused No.1 was found guilty and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- under Section 77 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 .

Summary of the Prosecution Case:

3. The survivor is a minor girl aged 16 years. The 1st accused had a brief affair with her for a period of about 6 months and thereafter, they parted ways when she understood that he was having other relationships. The prosecution alleges that the accused hatched a conspiracy to abduct the survivor and to rape her. On 13.10.2018, at about 9 p.m., the 1st accused called the survivor on her mother’s phone and informed the survivor that he was leaving for Bangalore the next day and expressed his desire to meet her. She was taken by the 2nd accused in his bike bearing Reg. No.KL-07-Temp-2626 to Fort Kochi Beach Walkway and to the breakwater nearby The accused Nos. 1 to 4, who were present there, forced her to drink beer from a bottle and to smoke a cigarette. She became unconscious immediately thereafter. It is alleged that while she was not in a conscious state, the accused subjected her to penetrative sexual assault by the side of a concrete barrier near the breakwater. Thereafter, she was taken to a multi-storeyed building by name “Jewel Arcade” situated at Layam Road, Ernakulam, and was again subjected to penetrative sexual abuse by laying her on the floor of the corridor on the 2nd floor of the building. After taking her to various places, She was finally dropped at a place called Manacherry from where she reached her home at 9.00 a.m. on 14/10/2018. On the next day, she called Childline and divulged the incident. They intimated the police and set the law in motion.

Registration of the Crime and the Investigation:

4. Based on Ext.P1 information furnished by the survivor at

12.30 p.m., on 16.10.2018, at her residence, Ext.P20 FIR was registered at 3.40 p.m. On 17.10.2018, PW23, the Assistant Commissioner of Police, took over the investigation. He seized the clothes worn by the survivor as per Ext.P17 Mahazar and the same was forwarded to the court. The clothes were then forwarded to the Forensic Science Lab. Thereafter, he prepared Ext.P2 mahazar of the spot from where the survivor was picked up by the 2nd accused. Thereafter, he prepared Ext.P18 Mahazar identifying the place at the breakwater behind the Cochin Club where the survivor was taken initially and she was allegedly forced to drink the beer. A2 to A4 were arrested on 17.10.2018 and they were produced before court. A1 was arrested o