SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15159

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
AMIT RAWAL, K. V. Jayakumar, JJ
SHYLAJA.K – Appellant
Versus
THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL PERSONNEL OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates:
U.BALAGANGADHARAN, S. BIJU, SRI.A.DINESH RAO, SC, RAILWAYS

JUDGMENT

K. V. JAYAKUMAR . J .

This original petition is directed against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No. 1051 of 2014 dated 07.02.2018, whereby the following claims of the applicant/petitioner have been rejected.

(i) Call for the records leading to Annexure A6, A8, A9 and A12 and set aside the same as illegal and unsustainable.

(ii) Direct the 1st respondent to consider promoting the applicant as Technician Grade II being the next meritorious person in Annex. A11 panel in preference to 5th respondent.

(iii) Direct the first respondent to pre-date the promotion of the petitioner as Technician Grade III with effect from 14.09.2009 notionally and grant consequential seniority in the post.

(iv) Declare that applicant is entitled to be considered and promoted Technician Grade III in preference to 5th respondent.

(v) Such other reliefs that the Hon’ble Tribunal deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. The petitioner/applicant Smt. K. Shylaja was aggrieved by Annexure A6 order, dated 20/082014 and Annexure A8 order dated 01.10.2014, issued by the Senior Divisional Personnel OfÏcer, Southern Railway, Palakkad. The applicant joined in the Railway as Helpe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top