SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43342

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. Ajithkumar, JJ
KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
DR.NOORJAHAN – Respondent


O R D E R

Anil K. Narendran, J The petitioner is the respondent-tenant in R.C.P No.17 of

2017 on the file of the Rent Control Court (Munsiff), Sulthan Bathery, a petition filed by the respondent herein-landlady seeking eviction of the tenant from the petition schedule shop room, under Sections 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(8) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The tenant entered appearance and filed counter statement opposing the order of eviction sought for. After considering the pleadings and evidence on record, the Rent Control Court, by the order dated 15.02.2020 in R.C.P.No.17 of 2017, ordered eviction of the tenant under Sections 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(8) of the Act, and the tenant was directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the landlady, within the time limit specified in that order. In the said order, it was made clear that the order of eviction granted under Section 11(2)(b)

will be vacated, under Section 11(2)(c) of the Act, if the tenant deposits the arrears of rent with interest and cost within a period of one month.

2. Challenging the order of eviction granted by the Rent Control Court, the tenant filed R.C.A.No.19 of 202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top