SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 48168

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. Muhamed Mustaque, SOPHY THOMAS, JJ
SAIFUDHEEN POOVATHINGAL – Appellant
Versus
MRS. HANAN ALVAI – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.T.ASAFALI, SMT.LALIZA.T.Y, SRI.P.M.ZAFARULLAH

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE , J.

These appeals are at the instance of the appellant-husband challenging an order granting divorce to the respondent-wife under the Dissolution of the Muslim Marriage Act . The appellant also challenges the dismissal of his petition for restitution of conjugal rights. When these matters are taken up, the learned counsel for the appellant reported 'no instruction'.

2. However, we are not persuaded to adjourn these matters.

We perused the pleadings and evidence.

3. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 23-2-2014 according to the personal law applicable to the parties. The parties are Muslim. The case of the respondent-wife was that she was physically and mentally harassed by the husband and the husband was in the habit of checking all her telephone calls and seeking an explanation from her regarding the calls made by her. It is also stated by the respondent that the husband prevented her from talking to others. It is the specific case put forward by the respondent- wife that the husband hacked her social media account and even went to the extent of tracking her movement through the GPS system. On account

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top