SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 12382

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945

BAIL APPL. NO. 10658 OF 2023

CRIME NO.1507/2023 OF KURAVILANGADU POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

NIKHIL T S

AGED 35 YEARS, SON OF T S SURESH BABU

THAZHATHUVALAPPIL HOUSE,

CHOORAKKATTUKARA PUZHAKKAL,

THRISSUR, AMALANAGAR, KERALA, PIN - 680555

BY ADV LUKE J CHIRAYIL

RESPONDENTS/STATE:

1

STATE OF KERALA

REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031

2

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

KURAVILANGADU POLICE STATION,

KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686633

BY SMT. T.V.NEEMA

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

30.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE

FOLLOWING:

B.A.No.10658 of 2023 2

An accused is entitled to pre-arrest bail if their custodial interrogation is not necessary and they have no criminal antecedents.

Headnote:

PRE-ARREST BAIL - RASH AND NEGLIGENT DRIVING - ELECTRICITY ACT - SUMMARY

Fact of the Case:

The applicant was accused of rash and negligent driving under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 139 of the Electricity Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant's car hit an electricity post, causing damage.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the applicant had no criminal antecedents and had been hospitalized for four days after the incident. The court also noted that the applicant's custodial interrogation was not necessary.

Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted pre-arrest bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant was entitled to pre-arrest bail as his custodial interrogation was not necessary and he had no criminal antecedents.

Final Decision: The court granted the applicant pre-arrest bail on the condition that he execute a bond for Rs. 1,00,000/- with two solvent sureties, cooperate with the investigation, appear before the investigating officer as required, and not commit any offense of a like nature while on bail.

O R D E R

Dated this the 30th day of November, 2023 This application is filed u/s 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.1507/2023 of Kuravilangadu Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 139 of the Electricity Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 24.10.2023 at about 8.00 a.m, the applicant drove his car bearing registration No.KL-45-M-7131 in a rash and negligent manner and hit against the electricity post causing damage to the post and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. I have heard Sri. Luke J Chirayil, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. T.V. Neema, the learned Public Prosecutor.

Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he entitled to get bail. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. Initially, the crime was registered under Section 279 of the IPC alone and Section 139 of the Electricity Act was added subsequently. The only allegation against the applicant is that the vehicle that he was driving got involved in an accident whereby the said vehicle hit the electric post. Annexure A2 would show that the applicant has been hospitalized as an inpatient for four days and he has no other criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations levelled against the applicant, his custodial interrogation does not appear to be necessary. For these reasons, it is a fit case where pre-arrest bail can be granted to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top