SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 12775

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
,
THE TAHASILDAR (L.R) – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA LOK AYUKTA – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

S. Manikumar, C. J.

Mr. Udaya Varma, the 2nd respondent herein, has preferred complaint No. 881 of 2014 before the Kerala Lok Ayukta, for the following reliefs:- “(i) There may be a finding that there is inordinate delay in completing the survey and demarcation of the property as per the direction of the Director of Survey;

(ii) The Respondents may be directed to complete the survey as proposed in Notice No. Sy H3-1842/06 dated

26.01.2006 (Exhibit P-3) within a months time;

(iii) There may be a finding that the survey personnel has committed gross negligence in finding that there is Puramboke land of 2 ½ cents of land in Survey No.

2746 and 2746 (1);

(iv) The Respondents may be directed to effect mutation in respect of the entire property of the Complainant and his mother as per the documents.”

2. Before the Lok Ayukta, respondents have filed a statement, which is reproduced:- “The complainant’s father late Sreenivansan was the owner of 22 cents (8.90 Ares) of property in old survey No. 2746 and in 2746(1) of Kilimanoor village. The resurvey records finalised and implemented in Kilimanoor village in 2004. As per the resurvey records the above land included in resurvey numb

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top