SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 13725

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SUBRAMANIYAN – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHSILDAR (LAND RECORDS) CHITTUR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to collect basic tax and issue possession certificate to the petitioner in respect of 10.5 cents of land which comprised in Re.Sy. No.199/5C, Muthalamada-I Village, Chittur Taluk, Palakkad District, covered by Ext.P3 judgment.

2. The petitioner submits that his father purchased an extent of 63 cents of land comprised in Re. Sy.No.199/5C, Muthalamada-I Village, Chittur Taluk, Palakkad District by virtue of Ext.P1 sale deed. The basic tax was paid by the petitioner in respect of the said property as is evident from Ext.P2 land tax receipt. The property on the western side was purchased by the Muthalamada Panchayat, which used to be separated by a small varamba, since 1984. The Panchayat while constructing a compound wall, encroached into the property of the petitioner at a distance of 12 feet east from the original boundary. Thereupon the petitioner's father filed O. S. No.352/1984 before the Munsiff Court, Chittur seeking mandatory injunction and the said suit was decreed as per Ext.P3. Though an appeal was filed as A.S. No.392/2001, Ext.P3 judgment & decree was confirmed and the second appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top