SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 12267

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
GOPINATH P, J
SREEJITH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. 9829 2023



Advocates:
P.K.VARGHESE, JERRY MATHEW, M.T.SAMEER, REGHU SREEDHARAN, RAMEEZ M. AZEEZ, JUSTIN K.K.

Anticipatory bail may be granted if allegations are doubtful and no prior criminal records exist.

Headnote:

Bail - Anticipatory Bail - Indian Penal Code 354, 354A, 341 - The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, noting doubts about the allegations and the absence of prior criminal records.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, accused in Crime No.1459/2023, faced allegations of touching a complainant's body and restricting her movement with intent to outrage her modesty. They claimed the allegations were false, arising from a complaint about food quality at the complainant’s hotel.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the allegations did not convincingly establish a case under Section 354 IPC, especially given the absence of previous criminal records and significant delays in reporting the alleged crime by the complainant.

Issues: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted based on the allegations made under Sections 354, 354A, and 341 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that anticipatory bail could be granted when allegations are dubious, especially in the absence of prior criminal activity by the petitioners and the nature of the allegations.

Final Decision: Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners subject to conditions.

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

2. Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.1459/2023 of Angamali police station, Ernakulam district, alleging commission of offences under Sections 354 , 354A and 341 r/w.34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. Allegation against the petitioners is that, on

22.10.2023, at about 03.30 PM, the petitioners, with an intention to outrage the modesty of the de facto complainant, restrained her near the cash counter of the hotel being run by de facto complainant and touched her shoulder and breasts and thereby, committed the offences alleged against them.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the allegations are absolutely false. It is submitted that the petitioners had ordered some food from the hotel being run by the de facto complainant and that they found certain plastic pieces and certain other waste in the curry that they had ordered and they questioned the de facto complainant regarding the same. It is submitted that the 1st petitioner is a Civil Police Officer and on coming to know that the 1st petitioner is a Civil police officer and on fearing that a complaint would be filed against her, the de facto complainant filed a complaint containing the allegations as noticed above, leading to registration of Crime No.1459/2023 of Angamali police station. It is submitted that there is a delay of three days in reporting the crime and that itself indicates that the allegations are false.

5. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also.

6. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners subject to strict conditions. No criminal antecedents are reported against the petitioners. The allegations are as noticed above. The only non-bailable offence alleged against the petitioners is that under Section 354 IPC . Even if the allegations are accepted to be true, it is doubtful as to whether the offence under is made out.

In the result, this application is allowed. It is directed that the petitioners shall be released on bail, in the event of arrest in crime No.1459/2023 of Angamali police Station subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Petitioners shall execute separate bonds for sums of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting officer;

(ii) Petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No.1459/2023 of Angamali Police station as and when summoned to do so;

(iii) The petitioners shall not attempt to contact the de facto complainant or to interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate any witness in Crime No.1459/2023 of Angamali police station;

(iv) The petitioners shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in Crime No.1459/2023 of Angamali police station may file an application before the jurisdictional court, for cancellation of bail.

It is made clear that the observations in this order are only for the purposes of considering the entitlement of the petitioners to bail and shall not be treated as a finding by this Court on any aspect of the matter.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top