SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6140

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
GOPINATH P, J
K.GOPALAKRISHNAN S/O.K.N.KESAVAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.MOHANLAL, P.S.PREETHA, ASWIN V. NAIR, ABIJITH M.KARTHIK, J SEKHAR

JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this Court, being aggrieved by the fact that certain complaints raised by the petitioner against respondent Nos.4 and 5 have not been considered by the authorities concerned.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that respondent Nos.4 and 5, being members of the managing committee of the 5th respondent-Society, have manipulated records to make it appear that they are supplying milk to the Society in a manner contemplated by the bye-laws of the Society. According to the petitioner, respondent Nos.4 and 5 are not complying with the bye-laws of the Society. Petitioner has submitted various representations, including Ext.P4, to the Honourable Minister for Dairy Development with copy to the 3rd respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the 3rd respondent may be directed to consider Ext.P4 representation made by the petitioner, in accordance with law.

3. Learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents would submit that Ext.P4 can be directed to be considered by the 3rd respondent, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and any other person, who may be affected

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top