HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.SOMARAJAN, J
GEORGY K. MATHEWS – Appellant
Versus
PANDANAD IMMANUEL MARTHOMA CHURCH, – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Since it is a matter under Section 80 (2) of CPC and the non compliance of mandate thereunder, notice to the party respondents 1 to 6 is hereby dispensed with. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
2. A suit was filed with a prayer for permanent prohibitory injunction as well as mandatory injunction pertaining to an illegal construction made over the government land. Interim application for injunction was also submitted so as to stall further construction of building over the property. But, the learned Munsiff framed two primary issues as to (1) whether the petitioner in this case is seeking urgent and immediate relief against the respondent Nos.7 to 14; and (2) relief and costs, and answered the issue No.1 in the following lines.
3. First of all, when a suit was instituted along with an interim injunction applica
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.