SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 3739

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
GOPINATH P, J
VELAYUDHAN K.C. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
P.V.VARGHESE (KANJIRAMATTOM), SUSANTH SHAJI, SMT.C.S.SHEEJA, SR.G.P

JUDGMENT

Petitioners have approached this Court essentially seeking a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to forthwith conduct and conclude measurement of property belonging to the petitioners under Ext.P1 and to fix the boundaries based on the provisions contained in Rules 27 and 43 of the Kerala Survey and Boundaries Rules . It is pointed out that the petitioners have already filed Exts.P8 and P9 applications under the provisions of the aforesaid Rules before the 2nd respondent. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that there may be direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P8 and P9, in accordance with law, and to do the needful to fix the boundaries as requested for by the petitioners.

2. The learned Government Pleader seeks time to get instructions. However, considering the nature of the relief sought for in the writ petition and considering the fact that Exts.P8 and P9 are statutory applications under Kerala Survey and Boundaries Rules , I am of the opinion that this writ petition need not be adjourned to enable the learned Government Pleader to get instructions.

Therefore, this writ petition will stand disposed of directing the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top