SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 3603

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
AMIT RAWAL, J
KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN(KVS) – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER, SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY, SRI.A.JAYASANKAR, SRI.MANU GOVIND, SRI.C.V.MANU

JUDGMENT

Multifarious reliefs have been sought in the writ petition.

As far as Ext.P9 notice dated 19.3.2015 is concerned, I am of the view that the writ petition is totally premature as it is a notice issued by the 3rd respondent, Kerala State Commission for Protection of Child Rights whereby a complaint bearing No.CRMP No.1992/2014/12/LA2/KeSCPCR was registered and an action report was sought from the respondents. Petitioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) if aggrieved, has a right to contest the same on merits by raising all the pleas taken in the writ petition. Even the outcome of the further proceedings taken in response to notice have not been apprised. Thus the writ petition qua laying challenge to Ext.P9 is premature.

2. As far as the other reliefs are concerned, it has been averred that petitioner is a Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) an autonomous organization, registered under the Societies Registration Act and an Autonomous body under the Ministry of Human Resources Development (HRD), Government of India with the objective to cater the educational needs of children of transferable Central Government employees including defence personnel by providing a common program

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top