SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 3031

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
1 JITHIN JOY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl.MC 8329/2022



Advocates:
SALIM V.S., A.M.FOUSI

Acquittals in prior cases do not preclude prosecution in ongoing cases with independent evidence.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 363, 370(2)(4), 370A(1), 376, 376(2)(i), 376D r/w Section 34 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act - Sections 4 r/w Section 3(a), 6 r/w 5(g), 17 r/w 16 - Quashing of proceedings - Petitioners sought to quash proceedings based on prior acquittals in related cases, arguing that the substratum of the prosecution case was lost. The court found that the evidence in the current case was independent of previous cases and dismissed the petition. (Paras 5, 7, 8)

(B) Abuse of process - The court emphasized that the petitioners' acquittal in earlier cases does not preclude the prosecution in the current case, as the evidence is distinct. (Paras 6, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners were accused of serious offences under IPC and PoCSO Act, involving the abduction and sexual assault of a minor. They argued for quashment based on previous acquittals.

Findings of Court:
The court found no merit in the petition for quashment, emphasizing the independence of evidence in the current case.

Issues: Whether prior acquittals can lead to quashment of ongoing proceedings for the same offences.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that acquittals in earlier cases do not affect the prosecution of distinct charges in the current case, and the petitioners must cooperate with the trial.

Result: Petition dismissed.

ORDER

Dated this the 6th day of January, 2025 This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , to quash Annexure 2 Final Report and all further proceedings against the petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 3 in SC No.103/2020 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court, Thrissur, arose out of Crime No.310/2015 of Iringalakkuda Police Station, Thrissur.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail.

Perused the relevant documents.

3. In this matter, offences punishable under Sections 363 , 370(2)(4), 370A(1), 376, 376(2)(i) and 376D r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘ IPC ’ for short) and Section 4 r/w Section 3 (a), 6 r/w 5(g) and 17 r/w 16 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘PoCSO Act’ for short) are alleged to have been committed by the accused. The prosecution allegation is that, petitioners 1 and 2 enticed a minor girl, aged 13 years from the lawful custody of her guardian from her house at 3.00 pm on 01.03.2015 and took her in a car to a nearby place. Then the car was parked on the road side and the first accused committed penetrative sexual assault on her, while the second accused waited outside the car. He thereby allegedly abetted the commission of crime by the first accused. Thereafter, they dropped the girl at another place in the custody of the third accused and he took her to Perumbavoor. There, accused Nos.3 to 6 repeatedly committed penetrative sexual assault on the victim and thereafter they handed over her to the 7th and 8th accused. They took her to another place, where they had committed sexual assault on her.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners sought quashment of the proceedings, mainly banking upon the acquittal of the petitioners in SC No.612/2016 and SC No.441/2017. On the facts of this matter, initially, Crime No.310/2015 was registered by the police under Section 5 7 of the Kerala Police Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘KP Act’ for short) on the basis of a complaint lodged by the father of the victim alleging missing of his daughter, who is the victim herein. The said complaint was lodged on 01.03.2015 and during investigation, the victim was traced out from a hotel in Bangalore on 05.03.2015. When her statement was recorded by the Police, she disclosed that several persons had committed penetrative sexual assault on her. On the basis of the said disclosure, FIR was altered, deleting Section 5 7 of the KP Act and adding Sections 366A and 376 r/w 34 of IPC and Section 5 r/w 6 of the PoCSO Act. Thereafter, Section 3 r/w 4 and Section 16 r/w 17 of the PoCSO Act were also added. During investigation, 26 persons were arrayed as accused. It is submitted further that after completing the investigation against petitioners 1 and 2, final report dated 30.05.2015 was submitted before the 1st Additional Sessions Court, Thrissur and the same was numbered as SC No.612/2016. Thereafter, investigation against other accused continued and final report dated 29.03.2017 was submitted before the same court against the 3rd petitioner herein and 5 other accused and the same was numbered as SC No.441/2017. Thereafter, the investigation against the remaining accused continued by the 3rd respondent/Crime Branch, Thrissur. After completing the investigation, the 3rd respondent submitted final report against the petitioners herein and other remaining accused, who were not charge sheeted, and finally, the case against all the accused was numbered as SC No.103/2020, arraying the petitioners herein as accused Nos.1 to 3, which has been pending before the 1st Additional Sessions Court. The trial court took cognizance against the petitioners and the other accused and issued summons.

5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners herein have been charge- sheeted twice for the very same offences. So, challenging th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top