HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V. G. Arun, J
FAISAL PARI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. directions in dr.sajeer's case (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. directions extracted (Para 4) |
| 3. scrutinise the issue (Para 5) |
| 4. power of police (Para 6) |
| 5. delay in reporting (Para 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 02nd day of September, 2024 The petitioner is aggrieved by the sudden freezing of his account by the bank based on requisitions/intimation received from the police. The police in turn has acted on the basis of Cyber Crime Incident Reports filed by persons subjected to online financial fraud/UPI fraud.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court in Dr.Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of India [ 2024 (1) KLT 826 ] has addressed the plight of similarly situated persons, and after elaborately dealing with the revolutionary change in money transactions with the advent of Unified Payment Interface (UPI for short), as also the positives and negatives of UPI transactions in the context of Cyber crimes and Online fraud, the writ petitions were disposed of with certain directions. The petitioner is also seeking disposal of his case in similar manner.
3. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Standing Counsel for the bank, learned Government Pleader and the learned Centr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.