SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 46120

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V. G. Arun, J
FAISAL PARI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
ANJANA KANNATH

Table of Content
1. directions in dr.sajeer's case (Para 2 , 3)
2. directions extracted (Para 4)
3. scrutinise the issue (Para 5)
4. power of police (Para 6)
5. delay in reporting (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 02nd day of September, 2024 The petitioner is aggrieved by the sudden freezing of his account by the bank based on requisitions/intimation received from the police. The police in turn has acted on the basis of Cyber Crime Incident Reports filed by persons subjected to online financial fraud/UPI fraud.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court in Dr.Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of India [ 2024 (1) KLT 826 ] has addressed the plight of similarly situated persons, and after elaborately dealing with the revolutionary change in money transactions with the advent of Unified Payment Interface (UPI for short), as also the positives and negatives of UPI transactions in the context of Cyber crimes and Online fraud, the writ petitions were disposed of with certain directions. The petitioner is also seeking disposal of his case in similar manner.

3. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Standing Counsel for the bank, learned Government Pleader and the learned Centr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top