HIGH COURT OF KERALA
JOHNSON JOHN, J
JOHN – Appellant
Versus
STATE AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defense challenges prosecution evidence (Para 7) |
| 2. credibility of injured witnesses (Para 18) |
| 3. evidence of injured witnesses (Para 19) |
| 4. compensation ordered for victim (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT
The above appeal is filed by accused Nos. 1 and 2 in S.C. No.
439 of 2006 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Ernakulam challenging their conviction under Section 324 IPC and releasing them on probation of good conduct for a period of one year under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (‘the Act’ for short). The Criminal Revision Petition is filed by the de facto complainant against the order releasing the accused on probation of good conduct, instead of awarding appropriate sentence for the offence committed.
2. The prosecution case is that on 24.02.2006, at about 9 a.m., while the de facto complainant and his workers were making preparations in connection with the construction of the first floor of the building owned by the brother of the de facto complainant near Pattimattom junction, the accused, who are residing adjacent to that property, raised objection against the construction of the first floor and thereafter, they attacked the de facto complainant with a sic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.