SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 45840

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M/S.KAIZEN PHARMACEUTICALS – Appellant
Versus
STATE REPRESENTED BY DRUGS INSPECTOR – Respondent


ORDER

Petitioners are the accused Nos.4 to 7 in C.C.No.714/2016 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court – V, Kozhikode. The above case is filed alleging offences punishable under Section 18(a)(i) read with Section 27(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

2. The allegations against the petitioners are that on the label of certain drugs allegedly manufactured by the petitioners, it is written that 'marketed by M/s.Meditrina Pharmaceuticals, Palace road, Nilambur’ whereas the said said concerned was closed down and no longer functional. Hence it is alleged that the said inclusion on the label amounts to misbranding of the drugs as defined under Section 17C of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

3. It is further alleged that on search conducted by the Inspector at the office of the 1st accused, the following were found stocked.

“(i) A1 was found to stock for sale 156 numbers of Catrina Eye Drops (Item No.4 in Form 16 dated 01.04.2013) marketed by M/s. Meditrina Pharmaceuticals, Palace Road, Nilambur manufactured by A4. The date of manufacture printed on the label of the drug is 11/2011 which is six months after the closure of M/s. Meditrina Pharmaceuticals, Palace Road, Nila

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top