SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 10261

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
K.A. ABDULLA HAJI – Appellant
Versus
LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER – Respondent


Advocates:
PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH, K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR, VANDANA MENON, VIMAL VIJAY

JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this Court challenging Exts.P13 and P14 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to accept and adjust the amount of Rs.66,875/- deposited by the petitioner as the full and final closure of the demand raised.

2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of the writ petition are as follows: Petitioner is the owner of a timber mill and has taken on lease an extent of 5 cents of Government land which was lying nearby the mill of the petitioner as per the provisions of the Kerala Land Assignment Act . It is contended that at the time of granting lease Rs.375/- was fixed as rent and the same was subsequently revised to Rs.1,125/- and the petitioner had paid the lease amount till 1988-1989. It is contended that after 1989 petitioner was not using the land for stocking timber which the authorities was informed also. Subsequently for the period from 1996-1997 and 1997-1998 the petitioner was issued with Ext.P1 order granting lease at the rate of Rs.2,250/- for a period of two years and when the petitioner applied for renewal of lease during 1999-2000 it was informed by the 4th respondent as per Ext.P2 notice that an amount of Rs.45,000/- is due fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top